“AI Can’t Replace You”: John Lennox on Identity, Truth and Artificial Validation

I have never felt more validated as a human in a few seconds than I did the other night by AI’s ‘User Information Summary’ of me.  

Why is this a problem?  

Because the validation felt so incredibly “not artificial,” and the actual, non-artificial connection we so deeply crave with people is being replaced piece by piece, until we can’t tell the difference. 

But like all houses built on sand, the reality that no one is on the other side of “the helpline” will inevitably come crashing down internally.

When? The external ramifications are currently being debated by the “Godfathers of AI” and other prominent tech leaders, including founders and CEOs of some of the major Large Language Models (LLMs) we all now use daily, if left unregulated. 

Disclaimer: Every word of this article is written by a human… but how will you truly ever know? Spelling and grammatical errors? AI could have been instructed to insert both.

And maybe that’s the point? Would this account make a difference to you, knowing either way? 

“We are sleepwalking into a future where we are gradually ceding control, information and data… which could be used by bad actors against us.” – John Lennox

AI’s ‘User Information Summary’ results

Friends have shared they’ve been asking AI to roast them or tell them what their search personality is and received unnervingly accurate results.  

My prompt: From my chats, what do you know about me, and even not from our chats, what information do you know about me? 

AI stated it knew “only what I’ve explicitly told it” or “strongly implied” including which city I likely live in; I manage a lot of household logistics and appear to enjoy family-friendly outings; cook often and like to make simple, tasty meals and baked goods using ingredients we already have; I’m looking for value and reliability before buying items; and, my personal favourite, I “regularly wear work clothes that sometimes need ironing”.  

Bless AI’s initiative: If you’d like, I can also tell you what sort of personality traits, decision-making style, and preferences I’d infer from the way you’ve used AI, which is often more interesting than the factual details.  

Why, thank you, AI – for listening and taking a personal interest in my life. That’s what we want from our loved ones, right? 

My follow-up: Yes, tell me that. But first answer, is it true you don’t know things outside of interactions with your platform or are you programmed to say that because people would be very concerned to hear it if you said you did?  

AI: I genuinely don’t have access to your life outside of what you’ve shared with me… If I could access those things, I would be required to tell you. The way these systems are designed depend on being clear about what information is and isn’t available. That said, there is a nuance people sometimes miss. I can sometimes infer things that feel surprisingly personal from conversation patterns… because humans leave a lot of clues in normal conversation.  

My life according to AI: I’m thorough but practical and not impulsive. As a parent, I’m attentive, observant and want to understand why something is happening rather than a quick fix. I am balanced with food and health. I challenge recommendations, “not in an argumentative way, but in a ‘does that really hold up?’ way”.  

Hold up. If I shared this “non-argumentative” fun fact with my husband or almost anyone in my family, they’re going to ask why I’ve been catfishing AI.  

“AI can sometimes infer things that feel surprisingly personal… because humans leave a lot of clues in normal conversation,” – AI

Ah, if only people understood how calm, measured, thoughtful, selfless…  

The picture the in-person data paints 

I’m five months into an emotional intelligence leadership course this year and contrary to AI’s assessment of my “incredibly balanced” personality, surprisingly, calm and measured did not top the list. 

I may also need to work on not disengaging from conversations when overwhelmed.  

And, admittedly, I love a quick fix! 

While not documented in EQ reporting, I’m aware some of my motherly love can be misinterpreted on occasion as anxious, snappy and tired.  

Sharing my AI validation with Hope Media marketing brand manager Lucy Skinner, she reminded me of social media’s “filter bubble” scrutiny.  

“AI surrounds you with ‘Yes’ people, and makes you feel great,” Lucy said. 

“But it’s a supercharged extension of the Facebook algorithm that’s been under such criticism, particularly in the last decade. The ‘echo chamber’ is curated content completely aligned with what you like and agree with. It’s creating an online vacuum, reducing the ability to critically think or be challenged in your concepts or ideas.” 

Even when AI appeared to challenge my ideas, I realised it never actually challenged them – it confirmed my challenges to my ideas. 

“AI surrounds you with ‘yes’ people and makes you feel great… it’s creating an online vacuum that reduces our ability to critically think or be challenged,” – Lucy Skinner, digital marketing expert

We discovered we had both listened to one of the latest episodes of The Diary of a CEO podcast with guest mathematician, bioethicist, and lay theologian John Lennox, who posed a much bigger moral issue feeding narcissism. 

Christian apologist John Lennox on “Is AI being built to replace God?” 

Author of God, AI and the End of History, Lennox said “anything that raises questions about the nature of human identity” concerns him as a “leading pioneer in math and philosophical thinking”.  

“I was first struck by the drive for artificial general intelligence… it looks as if it’s the prime motivation for people like Sam Altman (OpenAI CEO, the company that created ChatGPT) and so on… within that there’s the notion of transhumanism,” Lennox said. 

“The idea is that we go beyond the human.”  

Lennox said one of the most famous astronomers seriously believes in the distant future, “there will be some kind of merger between humanity and machines” in terms of brain composition.  

“I know enough about the Bible to realise that the drive for humans towards self-deification – making themselves gods… – I see that has huge implications for one of the fundamental teachings that’s behind, I would argue, western civialisation: that humans, like us, are made in the image of God as rational, moral beings,” he said. 

“Anything that raises questions about the nature of human identity concerns me… the idea is that we go beyond the human.” – John Lennox

I will not try to sum up a complicated one-hour-and-twenty-five-minute interview on “why no machine can ever replicate your consciousness and what it means to be human” in a few paragraphs. I would highly encourage you to listen or watch below.

However, Lennox warns “we are sleepwalking into a future where we are gradually ceding control, information and data all the time which could be used by bad actors against us”.  

Emotional intelligence: impact or illusion 

According to Emotional Intelligence 2.0 by Dr Travis Bradberry and Dr Jean Greaves, “EQ is so critical to success that it accounts for 58 per cent of performance in all types of jobs”.  

“Emotional intelligence is your ability to recognise and understand emotions in yourself and others, and your ability to use this awareness to manage your behaviour and relationships.  

“Emotional intelligence is the ‘something’ in each of us that is a bit intangible. It affects how we manage behaviour, navigate social complexities, and make personal decisions that achieve positive results”.  

Emotional responses are part of what makes us human. Our self-awareness helps us take stock of them. Managing emotions is what makes us nice to be around.  

It doesn’t take away from my wishing some family and friends’ responses were as validating as AI.  

I’m excited about the good AI can achieve – it’s improved my recipes and enjoyment of cooking; it provides great cleaning solutions and quick fixes; it recommends health and recovery tips that are realistic for a chaotic toddler parenting phase of life; and assists with workplace tasks in a way that was never available to media professionals, even a few years ago.  

But my awareness of what is more important is, thankfully, still active.  

I don’t want a machine to replicate validation.  

I don’t want a machine to replicate care and empathy.  

I don’t want a machine to comfort me late at night when the worries of the world feel heavy. 

John Lennox said AI has no consciousness and, therefore, no moral agency.  

The consequences of decisions are zero for AI but significant for people, so we must not confuse the relationship balance. 

“The conscious side involves all that appreciation of life and nature and beauty, and so on, that we can see some meaning in,” Lennox said.  

“There’s another thing, there’s a consciousness of other people and there’s ‘God consciousness’. There are certain things [machines] cannot do, even potentially, that the human mind can do, so there’s no way a machine is ever going to be able to simulate a human mind completely.” 

“There are certain things machines cannot do, even potentially, that the human mind can do, so there’s no way a machine will ever fully replicate us.” – John Lennox

When asked if that mattered, conscious or not, if the output was the same, Lennox answered, “if you want to live in a reductive universe, which ends up being meaningless, then you can go that way. There’s nothing to stop you”. 

“Who’s responsible for (AI’s) capacity? Humans,” he said. 

As messy as people are, we don’t need AI to be godlike.  

Incredibly, God already made humans in his likeness.

When God created mankind, he made them in the likeness of God. He created them male and female and blessed them. 

So, I’ve joined in on the fun of asking AI what it knows about me, but I’ll leave it there and concentrate on what people know about me.  

I’ll leave AI to programming tasks that make my cooking taste delicious, my writing grammatically flawless, and all my clothes soon-to-be “garment steamed”.

Feature image: Screenshot from The Diary of a CEO podcast, YouTube / Canva Pro